Login
Fingesten, P. (1973). The Symbol and its Silent Voices. Am. Imago, 30:413-415.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1973). American Imago, 30:413-415

Review of Current Books

The Symbol and its Silent Voices

Peter Fingesten, M.F.A. Author Information

In his latest book, Martin Grotjahn brings great intellectual culture to bear upon the symbols he analyzes. The ten chapters are not connected and do not represent a systematic treatment of the subject but reflect a wide selection of his interests. One of the key remarks of the book is “To listen to the silent voices of the symbol is a difficult undertaking. The more one tries to make the symbol clear in writing, the farther one moves away from it. The more one listens, the less one understands. The closer you look, the less you see it.” (p. vi.) His approach is descriptive or diagnostic without that creative interplay between symbol and analyst which we call cybernetic. Nevertheless, he offers many valid insights and felicitous rephrasing of classic Freudian concepts.

Grotjahn rightly critizes television for perverting the symbol to a slogan. According to the author, television has failed to become a new form of art experience; instead it is a kind of collective dream.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2013, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.