Login
Sachs, H. (1925). Metapsychological Points of View in Technique and Theory. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 6:5-12.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1925). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 6:5-12

Metapsychological Points of View in Technique and Theory

Hanns Sachs Author Information

Empirical proof of the existence of an unconscious was in the first instance an achievement of hypnosis (Bernheim's post-hypnotic experiment). This fundamental fact has formed the basis of psycho-analytic theory, but only through the practice of psycho-analytic technique has the full implication of this discovery been realized and its importance for the understanding of mental life been established.

The first formulations of psycho-analytic theory, embodied in the Studien über Hysterie by Breuer and Freud, are essentially based on the insight gained by the help of hypnotic technique. Hence the first question to be asked about the inter-relations of theory and technique is this: why was it that after this initial step hypnosis was incapable of contributing anything more towards advancing our theory? Or, to express the same idea in positive terms: why was it inevitable that a technique independent of hypnosis should be built up on this first theoretical principle?

The very

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2013, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.