Welcome to PEP Web! Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web. If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems. If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator. Username: Password: Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer. Athens user? Login here. Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1974). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 55:179-181

A Discussion of the Paper by Pietro Castelnuovo-Tedesco on 'Stealing, Revenge and the Monte Cristo Complex'

Charles Kligerman

I would like to say that this intriguing presentation by Dr Castelnuovo-Tedesco (this issue) is a skilful synthesis of a major plot and a subplot. But it really consists of two papers: one a cogent essay on pathological stealing as an expression of narcissistic revenge, the other a study in applied analysis of a work of art, The Count of Monte Cristo. Since I feel the connexion between these two is tenuous at best, I shall deal with the two parts as separate issues.

The major effort, the explication of pathological stealing, is most convincingly documented with relevant clinical material, particularly in the case of the man who was analysed. Dr Castelnuovo-Tedesco makes an important point in showing that the distinction between ordinary stealing and symbolic kleptomania is largely spurious. At a time when analysts were almost exclusively concerned with structural conflict and the vicissitudes of the Oedipus complex, neurotic stealing was considered a form of compulsive symptomatic acting out of a very specific and circumscribed nature, and indeed there do exist such pure types, though they are not often seen clinically. Yet it was always recognized that something else was amiss in addition to the obsessive-compulsive mechanism, some failure of the superego–ego-ideal system and especially a structural defect of the ego in the area of impulse control.

Without quibbling too much, I do think there is a variety of ordinary stealing that is not necessarily psychopat

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]