Login
Arroyave, F. (1982). Shaffer, H.; Burglass, M. E. (Eds). Classic Contribution... Pp. xlii+502. $35.. J. Anal. Psychol., 27:390.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1982). Journal of Analytical Psychology, 27:390

Shaffer, H.; Burglass, M. E. (Eds). Classic Contributions in Addictions.: New York, Brunner/Mazel, 1981. Pp. xlii+502. $35.

Fernando Arroyave

This book is offered ‘to provide perspective and insight into the origins of contemporary abuse, treatment and theory’, and the papers selected were chosen in the belief or assumption that the ideas expressed or implied have either significantly changed or will change the fields of addiction theory, research and practice.

The book is divided into six sections, and the subjects range from a historical perception to the research issues related to the addictions. One of the sections deals with the psycho-dynamics of dependence, with papers written by Rado, Chein, Vaillant, Wurmser, Khamzzian, Krystal, Raskim, Zimberg and Gendreau.

On the whole, analysts of all creeds and denominations have shown what can only be termed increasing lack of interest in the field of addiction and their writings have always been based on very limited clinical material. Without denying that some of the ideas put forward have made an important contribution to the field of addiction, the sad fact re

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2013, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.