Login
Dunn, J. (1994). The Dutch Annual of Psychoanalysis. I, 1993.: The Psychoanalytic Society and the Analyst, with Special Reference to the History of the Dutch Psychoanalytical Society 1917-1947. Han Groen-Prakken. Pp. 13-37.. Psychoanal Q., 63:813.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.
Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing: The Dutch Annual of Psychoanalysis. I, 1993.: The Psychoanalytic Society and the Analyst, with Special Reference to the History of the Dutch Psychoanalytical Society 1917-1947. Han Groen-Prakken. Pp. 13-37.

(1994). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 63:813

The Dutch Annual of Psychoanalysis. I, 1993.: The Psychoanalytic Society and the Analyst, with Special Reference to the History of the Dutch Psychoanalytical Society 1917-1947. Han Groen-Prakken. Pp. 13-37.

Jonathan Dunn

The problems in the development of the Dutch Psychoanalytical Society were the same problems inherent in all psychoanalytic organizations starting with Freud. Scientific controversies often mask the psychopathology and personal incompatibilities that more profoundly "split" psychoanalytic groups and institutes: conflicts related to envy, idealization, competition, power, etc. Groen-Prakken's chronicle highlights the Freud-Jung schism because many of the Dutch psychoanalytic pioneers were analyzed and trained by Jung. She also discusses the anti-Semitic attitudes of the early Dutch psychoanalysts toward their European counterparts who immigrated to the Netherlands during the Nazi regime; these more experienced analysts had a disorganizing effect on the smaller, less sophisticated, and perhaps more insecure Dutch group. Where the three main founding factions of psychoanalysis in Holland ("straight Freudians," university-affiliated psychiatrists who were seeking nonbiological theories of mental illness, and the Jungian-oriented group) stood on the issue of lay analysis, and how they dealt with this controversy, is also reviewed.


WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the PEPWeb subscriber and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form.
- 813 -

Article Citation

Dunn, J. (1994). The Dutch Annual of Psychoanalysis. I, 1993.. Psychoanal. Q., 63:813
Copyright © 2013, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.