Login
Layton, L. (1998). In Defense of Gender Ambiguity: Jessica Benjamin. Gender & Psychoanalysis. I, 1996. Pp. 27-43. Psychoanal Q., 67:341.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing: In Defense of Gender Ambiguity: Jessica Benjamin. Gender & Psychoanalysis. I, 1996. Pp. 27-43

(1998). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 67:341

In Defense of Gender Ambiguity: Jessica Benjamin. Gender & Psychoanalysis. I, 1996. Pp. 27-43

Lynne Layton

Benjamin adds an important new thread to her argument that bigender and bisexual positions are products of healthy development. Unlike many postmodern theorists who cast off developmental theory because they find it essentially conservative, Benjamin continues to explore development for its potential to produce what she calls postconventional subjects. The author builds on her theory of identificatory love and on Irene Fast's theory of preoedipal gender overinclusiveness (which, according to Benjamin remains a part of the psyche). She argues that, while oedipal gender relations split masculinity and femininity, and split loving another and identifying with another, these polarities can be deconstructed by other developmental gender categories, such as identificatory love (a homoerotic love of one who is like; the wish to be loved as like). In the preoedipal period, identificatory love and object love, being and having, may not be so different. These earlier gender possibilities that remain in tension with oedipal polarities can be reintegrated in postoedipal phases, and here lies the hope for postconventional subjectivity.


WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the PEPWeb subscriber and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form.
- 341 -

Article Citation

Layton, L. (1998). In Defense of Gender Ambiguity. Psychoanal. Q., 67:341

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.