Login
Herzog, B. (2011). Procedural Interpretation: A Method of Working Between the Lines in the Non... Psychoanal. Inq., 31:462-474.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(2011). Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 31:462-474

Procedural Interpretation: A Method of Working Between the Lines in the Nonverbal Realm

Bruce Herzog, M.D.

INTRODUCTION

Throughout the last century, verbal interpretation has been an inseparable companion to the process of psychoanalysis, and the ability to interpret effectively continues to be highly valued by psychoanalysts. Today many of us can convincingly argue that a thoughtful, well-timed interpretation still constitutes the most significant therapeutic event that can occur in an analysis.

Our acknowledgment of the importance of spoken interpretation can have its disadvantages, though. Efforts to fine-tune our ability to convey understanding by verbal means may run the risk of disavowing another essential aspect of our clinical work: namely that of nonverbal activities, which themselves can have a very powerful therapeutic impact. That we sometimes have difficulty finding the language to describe these activities and may occasionally neglect them shouldn't surprise us—nonverbal issues seem to be the stuff of intuition, not objective discourse. In most relationships, much of

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2013, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.