Welcome to PEP Web! Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web. If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems. If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator. Username: Password: Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer. Athens user? Login here. Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1995). Psychoanalytic Psychology, 12:575-582

Commentary on “Contemporary Structural Psychoanalysis and Relational Psychoanalysis”

Stephen A. Mitchell, Ph.D.

The articles in the special section of the Winter, 1995 issue of Psychoanalytic Psychology under the heading “Contemporary Structural Psychoanalysis and Relational Psychoanalysis” are presented in the spirit of “critical dialogue.” However, the dialogue offered by the authors is more like the kind of conversation Alice encountered in Wonderland than anything that might serve as the basis of a meaningful exchange of ideas.

The most appalling thing about these critiques of relational theories is how little effort these authors appear to have expended in trying to understand what it is they think they are arguing against. This sort of shallow disparagement is the sort of thing psychologists have long come to expect from the conferences and journals of the American Psychoanalytic Association; that it appeared in the journal of Division 39, without the targets even being offered an opportunity to respond, is truly disheartening.

Merton Gill, in his characteristic f

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]