Login
Wallerstein, R.S. (2007). Reply by Robert Wallerstein. Psychoanal. Psychol., 24:515-517.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(2007). Psychoanalytic Psychology, 24:515-517

Reply by Robert Wallerstein Related Papers

Robert S. Wallerstein, M.D. Author Information

Dear Editor:

Leo Rangell and I have a long history of personal friendship and professional comradeship. We have shared platforms and teaching activities in numerous settings. For the most part, we have seen eye to eye on the scholarly controversies that have occupied our discipline over the past half century, especially the issue of the development of the psychoanalytic psychotherapies out of psychoanalysis and the continuing relationship of these two therapeutics, in their similarities and their differences, as these have evolved during the historical process.

Where we have come to differ, and strongly so, is in the understanding of the theoretical pluralism that has come to constitute our psychoanalytic discipline since the development of the Kleinian metapsychology, starting in the 1920s, that rose out of the original theoretical and clinical differences between Melanie Klein and Anna Freud. Rangell's position, which I trust that I am characterizing fairly, is his conviction that

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2013, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.