Welcome to PEP Web! Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web. If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems. If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator. Username: Password: Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer. Athens user? Login here. Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1977). Psychoanalytic Review, 64:63-99

Psychoanalysis in Search of Pirandello: Six Characters and Henry IV

Alan Roland, Ph.D. and Gino Rizzo

I.

Perhaps no other dramatic works have so challenged the modern imagination as Pirandello's Six Characters in Search of an Author and Henry IV. Over the years, critics and audiences have endeavored to penetrate the deeper levels of meanings in these enigmatic and profoundly psychological works only to discover that a fully cogent explanation continues to elude them. It is hardly surprising, then, that the better known of the two works, Six Characters, has attracted a recent flurry of critical attention based on the principles of a sophisticated psychology not so readily available to an earlier generation of Pirandello critics.

The new critical approach was signaled by the work of a psychoanalyst, Charles Kligerman, in a 1962 paper entitled “A Psychoanalytic Study of Six Characters in Search of an Author.”12 Kligerman's study was followed in 1965 by Eric Bentley's article “Father's Day,”2 which offered an interpretation based on Kligerman's earlier work and i

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]