Welcome to PEP Web! Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web. If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems. If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator. Username: Password: Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer. Athens user? Login here. Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

Falzeder, E. (2002). Editorial Note to The Complete Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Karl Abraham 1907-1925. The Complete Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Karl Abraham 1907-1925, xxxi-xxxv

Editorial Note to The Complete Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Karl Abraham 1907-1925

Ernst Falzeder

The present edition is as complete as possible. All letters, postcards, telegrams, notes, and enclosures that have been preserved and could be found are reprinted without omissions or pseudonyms. It is a new edition in that the transcription, translation, and footnotes that appeared in the abbreviated publication of 1965 have all been replaced (see Preface).

The project was accomplished in several stages. First, I made a transcription, based on a microfilm of the German originals. Second, a translation into English was made (see Translator's Note). Third, editorial footnotes were added. My guiding line was to give the contemporary reader information about anything with which she or he might not be familiar: persons, events, literary and scientific works, quotations, cryptoquotations, allusions, and so on. Such annotation can only be an approximation: the specialist, on the one hand, might find some notes superfluous or redundant, where another reader, on the other, might want more in

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]