You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Freud's paper “Negation” (6) has provided impetus to a recently increasing number of research efforts in clinical and experimental psychology (7, 11, 12, 22, 23). The negation approach to a variety of investigative situations (What is a thing not! What could never be true of this or that! What is the furthest from a correct solution to task X!) is showing itself to be an effective means of eliciting the kind of “depth” material usually left to experimenter inference, or to such more radical procedures as hypnosis or drug administration. Under the influence of negation instructions the content of subjects' responses, whether in projective test situations, or in interview behavior, or in the performance of cognitive tasks, is consistently less “censored”—or more imaginative—depending on how we choose to appraise it. Consistently also the nature of the experimenter-subject relationship, and the subject's contact with reality remain relatively unaltered. Moreover, we can never doubt the source of the material, although we may ponder its exact