You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The aim of the Freudian method of interpreting dreams is to unveil or discover the archaic—the primal, the ancient, the primitive, what is hidden under the new. And it is by focusing on the details that this method is able to decipher the contents of a dream and give meaning to the psychic constructions it comprises. These details are the traces that must be identified and interpreted in order to construct the meaning of the dream and the movement of the past experience attached to it. Finding a lost memory means constructing it and this is done from the elements the patient brings into the session; these are always deformed fragments, remains of the past. These imprints of the past, preserved in the form of traces, emerge in the time of the psychoanalytic cure. As Freud writes, dreaming is another way of remembering, another way of modifying the traces by organizing them into dream images. The dream images are vestiges extracted from the ground and brought into the light, images of the day illuminated by the light of the night. They are constituted around a lost language, a language from elsewhere, carrying traces, remains, signs seen and heard, which time has inscribed, engraved in memory. These images convey the accents of lost languages, the murmuring of an imagined and distant past.
Freud's Ur designates the primal, which is what we obtain from the psychoanalytic clinic. The Freudian Ur emerges on the side of the infantile and it is constructed in the transference of the analytic situation: the Ur searches for the primitive, for the touch and the intimate dimension of the body. The primitive represents the dimension of unelaborated drives, combining