You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The authors describe the role of a supervision group of psychotherapists within a wider therapeutic field for severely disturbed borderline patients. The group concentrates on the transference and countertransference, seen according to Racker's distinction between concordant and complementary identifications. The implications of the prevalence of the complementary identifications over the concordant identifications of the therapists to their patients and the resulting regression to primitive defense mechanisms can be counterbalanced by the group's integrative functioning as receiver (1) of a variety of information about the patient, (2) of the therapist's attempt to understand and synthesize, and (3) of the therapist's countertransference reactions to his patient. The major discrepancies between the various conceptions of the borderline patients' psychic world and the appropriate therapeutic technique to be applied are also discussed, as well as the way the group filters the information and integrates the therapeutic thought. It might be said, therefore, that, in the “inpatient” phase of the individual psychotherapy, the group of psychotherapists functions, for the patient and the treatment, in a synthesizing context, as it provides the therapist with a space of integration for his split-off part of self and object representations, which the therapist makes use of for his patient.