You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
I am pleased to be able to discuss the paper, Further Thoughts on Trauma, Process and Representation, from our esteemed colleague, Dr. Howard Levine. He offers a novel perspective on trauma, one that highlights the massive damage that can be done to one's “elaborative possibilities” (Potamianou, 2015). Levine goes on to emphasize the need for an ontological, intersubjective psychoanalysis; one in which meaning, beginning unconsciously, can be both regenerated and generated (in the case of un-represented conditions) between the patient-analyst couple; and where human beings may creatively discover meaning in the here-and-now of the session, thereby entering into a state of being and becoming revived and altogether alive. I will start with a summary, and in the spirit of what Levine calls our “representational imperative” (Levine, 2012), I will mention a few further thoughts and images that popped up as I read his text, with special attention to his clinical vignette from his work with his patient-“Thomas.”