You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
By now, psychoanalysis has been developing for more than three-quarters of a century, during which time its clinical procedures have become well established. As in any systematic branch of medicine, it has made progress on two fronts: extending the scope of its methods to embrace clinical problems for which its founders had no adequate treatment—notably, into the area of “narcissistic” disorders—and making those methods more sensitive and discriminating, particularly through greater reliance on “empathy.” Although controversies continue—notoriously—over the metapsychological “underpinnings” of clinical psychoanalysis (or, perhaps, the word should be “superstructure”), we should not let those disagreements blind us to the record of slow but steady clinical advance. From Freud's own first, classic work on the treatment of hysteria, right on through to, e.g., Kohut's methods for dealing with diffuse anxiety, narcissistic rage, and other “borderline” symptoms, the story is one of genuine consolidation and growth. Whether we regard psychoanalysis as a branch of medicine, as an explanatory science, or—more comprehensively—as an “intellectual system” having applications within the fields of medicine, science, historical biography, and