The Scientific Style of Breuer and Freud in the Origins of Psychoanalysis

We have suggested a definition of scientific style, discussed the rationale for its study in published works, and explained differences in style demonstrable in the Studies on Hysteria.

An examination of Breuer's physiological research before and after his work in psychology demonstrates his deductive skills, technical ingenuity, perseverance, and precision in reporting results. In the Studies on Hysteria, the description of the case of Anna O. is in keeping with his physiological research. However, Breuer's withdrawal from the role of active investigator in the face of a transference-countertransference embroilment with denial and isolation of the sexual implications had fateful consequences. In the "Theoretical" chapter, there are inspired ideas, but the speculation, reasoning by analogy, and sparseness of evidence in his hypotheses represent a distinct and unique departure in Breuer's style. He appears to disclaim responsibility for his ideas, varies from caution to boldness in his assertions, and clings to his physiological theory.