You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
IT IS NO SIMPLE TASK to helpfully—and critically—appraise so large a canvas as the contributions to both the theory and the technique of psychoanalysis offered by Heinz Kohut and his many colleagues and collaborators, as well as to take one's own position within the range of clinical-theoretical outpouring—and response—that it has stimulated in our literature. Dr. Wolf in his introduction has given us by way of but the briefest sketch, some indication of the books and the works, in our own country and abroad, in our own field of analysis and in the cognate realms of social and behavioral and humanistic intelligence of man that have been directly stimulated by this psychology of the self. And Drs. Ornstein and Basch have, through the differences in their presentations, amply demonstrated that this fabric of self-psychology is far from the monolithic effort to alter the thrust of classical psychoanalysis within but one single-minded and rigidly held perspective that it is so often taken by outsiders to be—I shall say more on what I see as their differences in perspective on the essential nature of the contributions of self-psychology further on. Here I want, only for purposes of beginning, to underline a point referred to in passing by Wolf that even such basic matters as definition are not yet fully agreed upon; he talks of "a rather fluid situation … with shifting definitions even for such basic concepts