You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Analyses of the data from the Menninger Psychotherapy Research Project (MPRP) have consistently indicated little difference in the therapeutic outcome between patients seen in psychoanalysis and those seen in psychotherapy. Reanalysis of the data from the MPRP, utilizing a distinction between two broad configurations of psychopathology (Blatt, 1974), (1990a), (Blatt and Shichman, 1983), however, indicates that patients whose pathology focuses primarily on disruptions of interpersonal relatedness and who use primarily avoidant defenses (anaclitic patients), and patients whose pathology focuses primarily on issues of self-definition, autonomy, and self-worth and who use primarily counteractive defenses (introjective patients) differ in their responsiveness to psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. Based on recently developed procedures for systematically evaluating the quality of object representation on the Rorschach, reanalysis of the Menninger data reveals that anaclitic patients
Professor of Psychiatry and Psychology, Yale University; Faculty, Western New England Institute for Psychoanalysis.
I am indebted to Dr. Graham Kavanagh for making available typewritten copies of the Rorschach protocols of the subjects in the Menninger Psychotherapy Research Project, to Drs. Diana Hartley and Richard Q. Ford for their assistance in rating the distinction between anaclitic and introjective patients, to Dr. Stephen B. Tuber for scoring the Rorschach protocols including the Urist MOA, and to Dr. Judith B. Casey for scoring the representation of the human figures (OR+ and OR-) on the Rorschach. I am also grateful to Dr. Robert S. Wallerstein for making available the case reports of the patients in the Menninger Psychotherapy Research Project for the ratings of the differentiation between anaclitic and introjective patients, and for his comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
This research project was supported in part by a grant from the Catherine T. and John S. MacArthur Foundation and a bequest from the estate of Joseph Chassell, M.D., Ph.D. An abbreviated version of this paper was presented to The Society for Psychotherapy Research in Lyon, France, July 5, 1991. Accepted for publication March 14, 1991.
have significantly greater positive change in psychotherapy, while introjective patients have significantly greater positive change in psychoanalysis. These statistically significant patient-by-treatment interactions are discussed in terms of their clinical implications as well as the importance of differentiating among types of patients in studies of therapeutic outcome and of therapeutic process.