You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Paul Gray emerged almost instantly at the forefront of psychoanalytic theoreticians and clinicians when his paper “Psychoanalytic Technique and the Ego's Capacity for Viewing Intrapsychic Activity” appeared in this journal in 1973. This paper has approached classic status, having become a staple on Institute reading lists. Essentially, its theme is psychoanalytic listening, or, as Gray described it, analytic
perception. Gray noted at the time that this was one of the least well conceptualized aspects of our field, and one of the least discussed. His eloquently written paper seemed to have galvanized further interest in this area of our work.
Since then, Gray has extended the elaboration of his views in a series of papers on technique and on supervision. “The Ego and Analysis of Defense” is a compilation of these writings, nearly all of which had been previously published. Together with Samuel Ritvo's helpful foreword, summarizing the main chapters, and the author's own preface, orienting the reader to the evolution and development of his ideas, it offers a stimulating overview of the course of Gray's thinking.
In his 1973 paper, Gray differentiated between our mode of “free-floating” listening when the analyst is involved in attention to drive derivatives and that of a more purposeful stance when attending to defense against drive derivatives. The latter, he argued, drew upon a different aspect of the analyst's perceptual apparatus. Gray systematically illustrated the advantages in focusing attention on the ego's defensive operations as they take place within the hour. By offering the patient an opportunity for a more autonomous awareness of his or her own psychic processes, such listening minimized the likelihood of suggestion and persuasion substituting for the analytic work, Gray posited. Thus, he articulated a position for adjusting our focus so as to observe data limited to inside the analytic situation. This perspective did not mean confining attention only t