You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Sander Abend opened the panel by reminding the audience that questions about the relationship between environmental influences and intrapsychic conflict have been at the heart of psychoanalytic theory and technique from its very inception as a science, beginning with Freud's revolutionary thesis that sexual seduction in childhood lay at the root of neurotic difficulties and his subsequent shift in position after having discovered the central role of infantile sexual fantasies in normal development and in neurosogenesis. With the proliferation of competing schools of psychoanalytic thought, disputes arose about the relative weight to be assigned to external and internal factors, and differences with respect to this matter spawned modifications in technique.
The panelists, Abend went on to explain, were chosen not for theoretical diversity, but rather to set forth, illustrate, and discuss what Abend called “modern conflict theory.” Descended from the classical Freudian position, all four share a conviction about the determinative significance of infantile instinctual conflict on character and psychopathology. Because of the attention paid to the instinctual wishes embedded in intrapsychic conflicts, the resulting compromise formations, and the powerful impact of unconscious fantasies on mental life, critics accuse those who practice within this framework of paying too little attention to the