You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
While there had been intimations of the importance of relational considerations in Freud's clinical theory and in the writings of Ferenczi and Rank (Fogel 1993), it was Fairbairn's clarion call—“the object and not gratification is the ultimate aim of libidinal striving”—that initiated this most radical departure from classical theory. Living in Scotland in relative isolation from the centers of analytic activity, Fairbairn produced a series of papers, beginning in the 1940s, that limned an object relations model of developmental psychology and pathogenesis. His major papers were published together in Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality (1952), and subsequently his ideas were disseminated by two of his students and analysands, John D. Sutherland and Harry Guntrip.
It is only within the last fifteen years, however, that a true awareness has arisen of how central Fairbairn's concepts are to the current theoretical ferment in psychoanalysis, most notably to the creation of relational psychoanalysis. Otto Kernberg, James S. Grotstein, and Stephen Mitchell in particular, through their acknowledgment of his influence on their own thinking, have been key figures in effecting this recognition of Fairbairn's intellectual stature and his importance in the evolution of psychoanalytic thought.
David E. Scharff and Fairbairn's daughter, Ellinor Fairbairn Birtles, have compiled, in Volume I, those papers of Fairbairn that were published after the appearance in 1952 of Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality,