This study is an extension of a study conducted by Cabaniss, Glick, and Roose (2001) at the Columbia University Center for Psycho-analytic Training and Research. The original study described the supervisory relationship using responses from dyads of supervisors and supervisees. We collected similar data at the Cincinnati Psychoanalytic Institute, in order to compare the supervisory climate at a second site with that at Columbia. Overall, the responses were very similar and indicate considerable satisfaction with the supervisory process. Since the two institutes are very different in size, we describe the nature of their differences and speculate on the effects of size and climate on the supervisory process.

At each institute, questionnaires were distributed to all candidates and to the supervisors, with numbering so that each supervisory pair