You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
In expressing my appreciation to Vittorio Gallese and Donald Favareau for their commentaries, and particularly to Bonnie Litowitz for generating this dialogue, I have only the following brief thoughts: Since its inception, psychoanalysis has been an epistemology that crosses borderlines of mind, brain, and related disciplines, with a polyperspectival interpretive spread and an interdisciplinary vista. In an age of overspecialization, when disciplines fragment knowledge, generating their own vocabularies and frames of reference, genuine interdisciplinarity is an even harder ideal to reach—yet reach it and maintain it we must. The expansive biosemiotic framework elaborated by Favareau, together with Gallese's hardcore neuroscientific research, not only broadens our database regarding empathic processes but provides the perfect marriage between the study of “mind” and the study of “brain,” both of which must enter into the psychoanalytic reservoir of new knowledge. If psychoanalysis is to remain the ideal methodology for the study of conscious and unconscious processes, its metatheoretical foundations must evolve and grow into a genuine science of mind. To achieve this, we must continue to be enriched by, and aim for, maximum cross-fertilization and a sophisticated integration of knowledge from adjacent fields, as exemplified by this cross-disciplinary discussion. Today the dialogue focuses on Einfühlung; tomorrow on another topic. In my opinion, this is exactly the sort of interactive dialogue that our field will most benefit by.