You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
In her latest work, Jessica Benjamin offers a creative account of how the mind's interaction with other minds structures meaning within the interpersonal field and across development. Grounded in relational psychoanalytic theory, critical theory, and mother-infant observational research, Benjamin's writing unites disparate ideas into a cogent theoretical frame, described succinctly as recognition theory. Initially, this reminded me of my earliest exposure to psychoanalysis, before I had entered psychoanalytic training or engaged in any clinical work, in studies in the history of moral philosophy. This course of study grounded psychoanalytic conceptualizations of morality in Alexandre Kojève's influential reading of Hegel (Kojève 1947), wherein right and wrong are neither rational, divinely inspired categories that exist a priori, to be understood only through pure reason, nor qualities discernible only a posteriori, through an objective appraisal of perceptual data. Rather, right and wrong are themselves categories susceptible to the changing and seemingly irrational dynamics of master and slave, ways of relating and understanding one another that necessarily shift across human history in response to changing contexts. I came to understand psychoanalytic theory as a way of tracing a similar historical contingency at the level of an individual's history: a person develops convictions about right and wrong based on the idiosyncratic, embodied experience of inhabiting characteristic familial roles of motherhood, fatherhood, and/or childhood, each with varying aspects of mastery or servitude. Psychoanalytic theory offered a means of understanding how any of these individuals negotiate such roles, in order to get what they want while also feeling acknowledged by significant others in their subjectivity and agency. With this