You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Why, in psychoanalytic circles, do we find ourselves having to argue for the social? Because, answers Farhad Dalal in an important contribution to this cosmopolitan collection of essays, psychoanalysis is in the grip of an ideology which emphasizes the internal world of the individual. Yet we are also, in the words of S. H. Foulkes, ‘social through and through’; a concept of the social unconscious is required to fill out our account of ourselves. How might such an unconscious be thought about? How to avoid ‘drowning the individual in the social or treating societies as if they were persons’, as Regine Scholz, a group analyst from Düsseldorf, puts it (p. 265)? The book addresses these questions in six sections, each containing two essays; in the first, introductory part, an additional chapter by Dieter Nitzgen, from Heidelberg, critically outlines Foulkes's use of the idea. The remaining sections take up neurological perspectives, the