You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
This study aims at mapping and interpreting what is at stake in Lacanian psychoanalytic supervision. Using interview data of participants' personal accounts of supervision, the authors applied a thematic analysis to gain insight into what they believe are crucial components in these accounts of supervision. We interpret the data within the context of Lacan's text, ‘Direction of the Treatment and the Principles of its Power’, in which he articulates his conceptualization of psychoanalytic treatment. His views on interpretation (tactics), transference (strategy), and lack-of-being (politics) as the three elements that structure the actions of the analyst, guided our data-analysis. Participants indicate how their supervisor focuses on the symbolic dimension of speech, helping them avoid getting deceived by the dimension of the imaginary. During the supervision process, the supervisor does not respond from a master position, nor coach the supervisees. Supervisees develop their own style and framework for clinical work. Through discussing cases, supervisees learn to construct cases and focus on the singularity of the case, beyond structural diagnosis. Lastly, Lacanian supervisors only focus on the cases discussed, not on the person of the supervisee.