Clinical Commentary 52

Typically, the clinical material for this part of the Journal would inform the selection of commentators, but this time things happened rather differently. To some extent, the processes that have unfolded in recent years, in both broader social contexts and more specific professional ones, can be viewed through the lens of the well-established concept of the developmental significance of separation and individuation. The three commentators who contributed to this edition represent different analytic traditions (and countries); each has travelled a challenging and often lengthy path towards achieving an independent and productive existence (see, e.g., Dufresne & Vigneault, 2011; Robinson, 2011). The clinical material, which emerged after the commentators had been found, unintentionally illustrates this concept, as reflected in their thoughtful contributions.

Margaret Mahler (1985) suggests that the psychological birth of an individual is a process of separation–individuation, that is, the emergence of a sense of one's own distinctness and the establishment of relationships with the external world. These are two complementary and interconnected developmental processes: the former involves moving beyond symbiosis with the primary object, while the latter comprises the achievements that reassure a child of their unique characteristics. A significant outcome of this process is the formation of a stable and integrated sense of self.

The difficulties encountered on this journey can lead to various challenges in individual psychological development, as the clinical material presented here vividly illustrates. However, similar issues may also arise in much broader contexts, as evidenced by recent global news and issues within our professional environment. The ability to independently manage these complex situations, as well as assist others in doing so, is, to some extent, crucial to the well-being of individuals, institutions and societies.

Nearly three decades ago