You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Analysts traditionally have been reluctant to claim for their efforts at self-reflection the significance and value of self-analytic discovery At the same time, many of us measure the analysand's progress by the criterion of increasing self-analytic capacities.
Not enough has yet been written about the question of the validity of self-analytic efforts and moments. Caveats abound about the liabilities for self-delusion and premature closure to which such efforts are prone (Freud 1914, de Ekbor and Lichtmann 1982, Gomberg Panel 1994)
While acknowledging the cogency of such concerns, I enjoy the solace of knowing that there are no final insights to be come upon in the analytic quest, only further and always incomplete understanding. I share with certain others the conviction that genuine enlightenment and subsequent change can be the self-analytic outcome of sufficiently-motivated self-scrutiny (Ticho 1967, Poland 1977 and 1988, Calder 1980, Gardner 1983, Jacobs 1991).
I have elsewhere dwelt upon the motivating impetus for self-contemplation that lies in the ongoing tensions inescapable for most of us in our ongoing clinical work with our patients (McLaughlin 1993).