You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
In Psychic Retreats Steiner (1993) writes, “[I]t is better to have a conscious theory than an unconscious prejudice.” I would like to draw upon Steiner's words, and also leap from them, to add, “It is better to have a conscious preference than an unconscious prejudice.”
My conscious preference in psychoanalytic writing in general is for clinical writing, or for linking the clinical to the theoretical, and my preference, more specifically in the work of Bion, is in the child and adult analytic/therapeutic relationship, and not necessarily in the group process.
And so although I found the titles of these two volumes to be somewhat misleading in their omission of “the group,” I, and I hope the reader, can accommodate to that.
What I found somewhat more difficult to accommodate to, albeit with some good exceptions, is that there are not enough clinical examples of the workings of the groups described here, that there is more of a “telling” than a “showing,” and that there is not enough “learning from experience,” which was central to Bion's work, and which has, by now, become the expected and familiar hallmark of both new and classic writings on Bion (e.g., Bott-Spillius, 1988; Meltzer & Williams, 1988; O'Shaughnessy, 1992; Waddell, 1999).
That said, these are dense, serious, and scholarly books, and the contributions from authors from various parts of the world—Italy, France, Argentina, Brazil, the United States, and Great Britain—attest to Bion's broad influence. Many of the contributors elaborate on Bion's theories on groups—mainly