Three universally recognized diaries are compared with the account of a research subject who ended her diary by ending her life. The author explores the successful diarist's capacity to transcend the isolation of self by creating a perception of otherness to whom the diary is addressed, the other-in-the-self, that facilitates the emotional processing of one's life. Indeed, all diaries seek a response in their creation that alters the soliloquy through the diary's self-recognizing and self-reflecting function. In contrast, the suicidal diarist cannot break free of the solipsism of her mental state and the diary's plea to the other-in-the-self goes unanswered. The absence of response, the absent analyst, leaves the words stuck to their page. The study of the diary process makes it clear that there is no self without the other, nor a successful diary without a responsive and recognizing other-in-the-self.