You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
In this final article of three, the author responds to W. R. Bion's question, “What kind of poets and artists can [psychoanalysts] be?” The author explores the concept of imagination in psychoanalysis, drawing connections between Wallace Stevens's ideas and the work of Balint, Winnicott, Bion, and Laplanche. Stevens's imagination, “unsponsored by the holy,” provides an entry into poetry as a process in statu nascendi, where the sensuous and the psychic bind, emphasizing the importance of cultivating sensitivity to the emergence of consciousness. Imagination, like a dream, operates through displacement and condensation, using metaphors and metonyms to reshape reality. Stevens conceives poetry as “the life that is lived in the scene it composes” rather than the things themselves. The author argues that imagination is essential for self-preservation and that its expression—the sound of its words—helps us live our lives. The author also examines Stevens's notions of chaos and motion, and the ego's binding function as anti-motion or metastability. The article concludes by highlighting how Stevens's poetry reflects the idea of motion inherent in both the natural and psychic worlds.