You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Morris Eagle’s Toward a Unified Psychoanalytic Theory: Foundation in a Revised and Expanded Ego Psychology mounts a far-reaching and deeply researched argument that many readers will find heartening and some might find galling. To the author’s great credit, this book is written with all of us in mind. According to Eagle, the proliferation of analytic schools has created a crisis of coherence for our field, and our strongest solution is a mass return to and revision of ego psychology, the one psychoanalytic school that he feels offers an adequate and unifying theory of mind.
When I first encountered this book, I bristled at the premise—that the cure for our splintered field was to lay down our petty allegiances and gather in the ostensibly neutral territory that happened to be Eagle’s own turf. As I followed his argument, however, I was struck by his earnest, rigorous attempts to incorporate, rather than dismiss, the essential contributions of object relations, self-psychology, and interpersonal and relational analysis. Eagle works here like a patriarchal homebuilder, adding new wings to an original structure in the hopes that all analysts might find comfortable rooms of their own to come home to more often. Whether these rooms are adequate for permanent residence, as opposed to occasional reunions, may be another matter.
Eagle makes his argument in three parts: (1) using empirical research to demonstrate the supremacy and abiding relevance of ego psychology; (2) considering multiple critiques of ego psychology, and whether they point to a problem in the theory or the critic; and (3) proposing key expansions
of ego psychology to address those critiques he finds valid, ultimately hoping to offer a theoretical foundation broad and useful enough to accommodate the perspectives of multiple theoretical schools.
In his initial chapters, Eagle marshals numerous studies pointing to the importance of the ego’s inhibitory functions, particularly the capacity to cope with distr