You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
For what can the Grid be used beside communications? The use to which it is being put sounds useful as a start. It is necessary to have ‘definition’ for one: perhaps ‘binding’ would be a better term to apply; it needs definition itself.
‘Definitory hypothesis’ is another tem (col. 1).
Related to the above is the act of exclusion. One narrow restriction of the elements conjoined, or deemed to be conjoined, can be to restrict the field to ‘manageable’ proportions in keeping with needs of subject and objective: equally it may be related to the need to preserve the observer from emotional upheaval. The latter ‘use’ relates to ψ turbulence. In fact col. 1. definitory hypothesis, binding etc. … involves ex- and inclusion. Apparently, but actually?
Related to the above is the problem of ‘evolution’. If the constant conjunction is part of ‘evolution’, the question of inclusion and exclusion does not arise. It happens. Inclusion and Exclusion are part of the investigatory activity (col. 3? col. 4? What?). Hitherto it has been a col. 2, restricted to restriction. And to a relatively sophisticated activity – classification itself being sophisticated.