You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Jeffrey Masson's controversial critique of psychoanalysis and its origins, The Assault on Truth: Freud's Suppression of the Seduction Theory (see review by Kovel, 1985), attempted to show through original documents that Freud denied the reality of sexual assault on women. In his new book — a collection of nine translations of French and German medical papers from 1865 to 1900, with a lengthy introduction —
Masson delves even further back for evidence to muster a broader attack on present-day psychotherapy in general.
In the introduction, he charges that extreme Victorian therapeutic attitudes towards women and their sexuality remain central to psychotherapeutic practice today. Women (and children), he claims, are not only abused, but made to feel guilty through the approach of ‘blaming the victim’. He also contends that women, particularly, continue to be brutalized by surgery, drugs and electroshock — the tools of modern medical psychiatric treatment.
Masson culls a narrow range of papers, including a number of shocking examples of sanctioned nineteenth-century medical malpractice. His authors are essentially minor figures of European psychiatric thought.
Given these inherent limitations, Masson's collected papers cannot carry the burden of proof for his broad argument indicting modern psychotherapeutic attitudes. By taking a sensational and sweeping approach to the serious, complex issue of therapeutic attitudes, he stands to alienate many critical readers who would be sympathetic to aspects of his argument.
Here, as in his book on Freud, Masson demonstrates his knack for loosely tying historical documents to currently charged issues such as child abuse and women's sexual assaults. Again, he offers an interesting and provocative thesis which will undoubtedly capture public attention and generate lively and emotional debate. Justifiably, his scholarship will again come under attack.
While there is undisputed value in looking back for the roots of ‘therapeutic abuse’,