You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Recently, there has been a host of works dealing with the theory of the subject in the light of certain social phenomena referred to as post-modernity and seen to be cultural extensions or generalizations of what were previously labelled as individual pathologies. The sickness is now seen to be not only in the individual but also, and worse still, to have spread epidemically to large groups in society, even to a cultural Geist. By way of example, I will refer primarily to one such case, which Free Associations has asked me to review, David Michael Levin's edited collection of essays, Pathologies of the Modern Self: Post-Modern Studies on Narcissism, Schizophrenia and Depression (1987). This book has two sets of texts, at least on the surface: (1) those dealing with an epistemic critique of the institutions of pathology, i.e., the physical and disciplinary sites of its emergence; and (2) those dealing with the possibility of the emergence of a self different from the modern self and its positive and negative implications. Perhaps the dominant claim of this second group of articles and several other works of its kind, such as Christopher Lasch's The Culture of Narcissism (1978) and Richard Sennett's The Fall of Public Man (1977), is that this is a narcissistic age, and somewhat paradoxically, depending, that is, on how one defines narcissism, one which empties the subject of its interior contents and investments of