You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
We know, often with blinding obviousness, what it is we are trying to say about our relations or non-relations with the poem, the painting, the sonata. Yet we do not know either how to say it or, in any falsifiable, material sense, exactly what it is we are talking about.
For as long as I can remember I have loved the paintings of Mark Rothko. My aquaintance with the work of Richard Diebenkorn is, as I explain later, more recent. The remarks that follow represent an attempt, inevitably personal, to make sense of this affection.1
I cannot recall the first time that I ever encountered a painting by Mark Rothko, but for as long as I can remember I know that they have moved me in ways that few other paintings have. One Sunday, bleak and grey in that particular way that British Sundays can be, in an attempt to shake myself free of the grip of a monumental depression, I struggled through insane traffic jams until eventually I reached the Tate Gallery. I must have seen these paintings before for I seemed to know they were there and without stopping to look at anything else, I made my way directly to the Rothko room. There I sat surrounded by Rothko's great paintings, the Black on Maroons