You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
In an era of strong changes, social disintegration and the dissolution of the contemporary individual’s identity seem to be mutually interconnected phenomena. With the collapse of socio-family containers the individual finds himself overwhelmed by existential anguish and prey to a painful feeling of void. Therefore, the face of contemporary psychopathology turns out to be the illness of the relationship with the other. Thus marks the transition from what Lasch had already defined in 1979 as a “culture of narcissism” toward what can be called a culture of void. Tyrannized by a deadly Ego ideal, the contemporary individual is in fact characterized by the most melancholic aspects of narcissism linked to the death drive, to the point of sinking toward the abysses of the negative in the direction of the “death narcissism” as defined by Green. In contrast to a culture of void, psychoanalysis is called to propose a new form of encounter, co-constructing a relationship aimed at favoring creativity and reactivating the interrupted process of subjectivation, starting a new drive dance and thus allowing the individual’s inner world to come back to life. After all, as Benedetti states, “psychotherapy is an existential challenge”; will psychoanalysis be able to respond?