You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become embedded in organizational life, their function extends beyond efficiency into the management of feeling. This paper introduces automated reassurance as a contemporary form of social defense: the institutionally organized use of AI systems to hold anxiety, guilt, and moral ambivalence on behalf of those who act in the organization’s name. Drawing on Winnicott, Bion, Klein, and the Tavistock tradition, I argue that AI is not only installed as infrastructure but also imbued with artificial agency, positioned as if it could know, care, and decide for the institution. Using three stylized vignettes (a performance-tracking algorithm, a workplace wellbeing chatbot, and a predictive HR risk model) the paper shows how AI systems operate as false holding environments and pseudo-containers, acknowledging emotion only to redirect it and providing reassurance without encounter. Automated reassurance names this pattern and clarifies how AI is recruited to preserve institutional coherence while hollowing out opportunities for genuine holding, conflict, and ethical reflection. By reframing AI as a fantasy-laden participant in social defenses, rather than a neutral tool or autonomous subject, the paper offers a psychoanalytic lens on what organizations ask machines to carry when they no longer wish to feel.