You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The Bishop of Durham sums up the issues of faith-healing and criticizes the cures attributed to Lourdes, also the methods employed by such spiritual healers as Hickson and Maillard. He criticizes Anson's book on Spiritual Healing and suspects that the theological foundation of the argument for spiritual healing is unsound. He thinks that the opinions expressed in the Lambeth Conference of 1920 led to confusion. We find ourselves in sympathy with some of his opinions. He implies, for instance, that psycho-therapy is a part of medical science and that no one, whether priest or layman, should be allowed to practise physical healing unless medically trained and licensed. He is of the opinion that the clergyman's duties do not include physical healing. Dr. Hensley Henson evidently thinks that he as a clergyman is entitled to criticize psycho-analysis, which is another branch of medical science. In his introduction we find the extraordinary statement that 'spiritual healing' adopts Freud's method of psycho-analysis. Later he proceeds to criticize what he is pleased to call 'Freud's crazy and disgusting over-emphasis of the sexual factor'. It is not surprising to find that he is ignorant of psycho-analytical science and that he indulges in the stereotyped objections, but it is difficult to understand his confusion of the terms 'physical' and 'psychical' as applied to therapy.