You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The title will already have told something about the relation of this paper to the subject of technique. Unless we adhere to principles of technique we either sacrifice their elasticity for the narrow rigidity of rules, or we are outside the realm of law and order and limited to that of shifting expediency. Most papers on technique give us the opportunity of feeling our way toward such principles in a variety of analytical situations, or give a limited number of rules adapted to a limited number of typical situations. Of English papers James Strachey's1 brought us nearest to consideration of principles, but only Freud himself has given us principles of technique.
A recent stimulus and help has been Hellmuth Kaiser's paper on Problems of Technique.2 This paper seems to me to grasp the nettle of difficulty both firmly and promisingly. To whatever extent I differ on some of the side-issues, its main theme, reliance on the analysis of resistances, is in complete and, to me, welcome accord with my own previous conclusions, and is stated with much clarity. As Kaiser has pointed out, Freud has, so far at least, left us with little more than a clear indication that the most promising way to pursue is that of the analysis of resistances. Yet Kaiser's paper, following Reich's in some points, is the first to deal specifically and thoroughly with this subject, however much it may be implicit and occasionally explicit in other work on technique.3