You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
This work belongs to the first great period of Freud's creative writing that began with The Interpretation of Dreams. It appeared almost simultaneously with the Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, and there is some doubt as to which was published first. In this edition it follows the Three Essays presented after the case-history of 'Dora' in Vol. 7. It seems to have been written as a reply to a complaint by Wilhelm Fliess that the dreams cited by Freud were too full of jokes; but it was a book by Theodor Lipps that was the decisive factor.
The present title and translation by James Strachey are entirely new and his task presented more than usually formidable problems. The first was the number of plays upon words which are untranslatable. Neither omission of such examples, nor their replacement by comparable English examples, accords with the aim of the Standard Edition to give accurate renderings of Freud's work: the editor-translator solved the problem by giving such words in the original German and explaining them in brackets or footnotes. As he remarks: 'Inevitably, of course, the joke disappears in the process.' This is really no matter, since the joke disappears equally inevitably in the course of Freud's own analysis of it.
The most serious difficulty, however, was that German and English terminology in this field do not exactly coincide. In English the word 'wit' is a more sophisticated term with narrower connotations than the German 'Witz'. The word 'joke' is a wider term, too wide in that it can also cover the German 'Scherz'. The solution here adopted is the uniform rendering of 'Witz' by 'joke' (except in one or two special instances) and 'Scherz' by 'jest'. The adjective 'joky' would have saved James Strachey a lot of trouble, but he confesses that he 'had not the nerve to use it'. Some dislike will probably be felt for the term 'joke-work', but it is an exact counterpart to the analogous 'dream-work', and no uglier than several other te