You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
A review of the literature and the collation of a variety of clinical impressions related to the phenomena of the second analysis suggest and reinforce certain observations concerning indications for psychoanalysis. In making an assessment at a particular time we must consider all the relevant capacities for functioning as an analytic patient we can discover through a close study of the derivatives and characteristic evidences of the patient's id, ego, and superego influences in the history and consultation. These must be thought of in conjunction with the patient's environment and its vicissitudes, particularly as they are likely to be influenced by the experience of being in analysis itself. Another crucial factor to be weighed in determining the propriety or possibility of a particular analysis is the suitability or match between the patient and the prospective analyst. Hoped-for clues to the anticipation or technical handling of difficult resistances are not usually available, and are in any event, no substitute for a constantly alert and theoretically well-grounded clinical perspective in the conduct of the analysis. Only in this way can the assessment of analysability and of the available technical and theoretical skill be combined to provide realistic estimates of analytic prognosis.