You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Starting from Glover's inquiry (1939), which indicated that psychoanalysts only unwillingly establish contact with their patients' relatives, the first part deals with the literature on this subject. In interviews with relatives basic principles concerning general professional discretion are touched upon. In the second part the authors show why psychoanalysts prefer to avoid contacts with relatives: they wish to prevent complications in the two-person relationship. In the third part undesired and non-therapeutic side-effects are described which must be attributed to the psychoanalytic situation and which arise particularly when the eccentric position of the relatives is strengthened. Pertinent empirical results gained by strictly avoiding interviews with relatives are discussed. The reluctance of some psychoanalysts towards interviews with relatives, a kind of 'professional countertransference', is described and the unfavourable consequences that this uncontrolled 'countertransference' may have on the patient and his relatives is discussed (part 4). Finally, in the fifth part, four illustrating case reports are given.