You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The decision of the Organizing Committee of the Third Pre-Congress Conference on Training to issue three pre-circulated papers on supervision, two of which would cover the theoretical and the technical aspects, relieves me of the need to treat these aspects in detail and allows me to focus my attention more particularly on the third one, which deals with specific supervisory problems.
Before entering into a thorough discussion of this subject I am tempted to quote Freud's well-known remark upon the three 'impossible' professions: analysing, educating and governing (1937). As supervision implies a process of education, and the training analyst usually holds a post within the institute, it follows that he is, ipso facto, engaged in the three demanding and 'painful' tasks. Concerning the first of these, the task of analysing, Freud asked himself: 'But where and how is the poor wretch to acquire the ideal qualifications which he will need in his profession?' (1937). I would like to apply Freud's words to educating and pose still another question: How can the training analyst cope with the heavy burden imposed by the practice of these 'impossible' activities while trying at the same time to do his work well? Naturally, the first answer is to be found in the analyst's own analysis that, as Freud pointed out, still stands as the most reliable guarantee. The deeper and the more successful this analysis is, the more confident and resourceful will the analyst feel in his work. Apart from this, the analyst should be endowed with other requirements: knowledge, intuition, talent, teaching capacity, empathy, etc.1
We are now confronted with the first serious problem in the context of supervision that, as far as I know, has not yet been faced or solved in the majority of psychoanalytical institutes. I refer to the lack of concern for teaching graduate analysts in their turn, so that they acquire a capacity for teaching. This deficiency glaringly contrasts with the thorou