You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Screen phenomena are conscious presentiments that both embody and repress infantile experience. This idea was first specified by Freud in connection with memories, where the recollection of certain early memories served the repression of later memories and their derivatives (Freud, 1899). Shortly thereafter, Freud (1901) added displacements forward and 'contiguous' screen memories to the possibilities of their chronological deception.
Here the essential thing with which the memory is occupied precedes the screen memory in time. Finally, we find yet a third possibility, in which the screen memory is connected with the impression that it screens not only by its content but also by contiguity in time: these are contemporary or contiguous screen memories (p. 44).
And in a still subsequent work, Freud finally acknowledged his suspicion that all memories are screen memories, i.e. all memories both retain and distort personal history (Freud, 1914a).
Actually, in this final formulation Freud was saying no more than what psychoanalysis always maintains: namely that every psychological event consists of manifest and latent qualities. It is only convenience that prompts us to distinguish categorically among psychological events, as, for example, when we distinguish between the forgetting of proper names and the recollection of a screen memory, as Freud does in Chapter IV of 'The Psychopathology of Everyday Life' (1901), or between a dream and a neurotic symptom, as Freud does in the last chapter of 'The Interpretation of Dreams' (1900). But what Freud always hoped to reveal about the events he often distinguished was that the laws that describe the articulation of manifest and latent qualities are singular and unvarying—they have a 'sameness in essence', to use Lewin's phrase (1961b) —regardless of the category of event under consideration.
Thus Fenichel (1927) found it plausible to compare the function of screen memories to the function of perversions, 'where repression of