You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
For the purpose of developing a multidimensional personality questionnaire on a psychoanalytic basis, a system of categories consisting of 29 (31) specific scales and four (five) superior global scale areas (oral, anal, phallic-oedipal, unspecific for the phase concerned, to be attributed to more than one phase) was set up. Three analysts placed 159 global (excerpted from the literature) personality items of a typical analytical nature and 687 special behaviour items into this system of categories. The following inter-observer accordances were found. (1) Global categories for global items: (a) three analysts in accordance with literature—31%; (b) at least two analysts in accordance with literature—55%; (c) three analysts in accordance with each other—43%; (d) at least two analysts in accordance with each other—89%; (2) Global categories for special behaviour items: (a) three analysts in accordance with each other—40%; (b) at least two analysts in accordance with each other—76%; (3) Specific categories for special behaviour items: (a) three analysts in accordance with each other—26%; (b) at least two analysts in accordance with each other—66%. This degree of accordance seems to constitute a questionable basis for a test construction; it corresponds, however, to the measure of agreement about the formation of diagnoses published in the field of clinical psychiatry.