You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The Chairman of the Panel and the Open Forum was Serge Lebovici (Paris). He introduced the panellists and invited them to discuss their views on the topic of 'The Ego Ideal of the Psychoanalyst' that had previously been introduced in the papers given by E. Joseph (this issue) and D. Widlöcher (this issue).
Evelyne Kestemberg opened the discussion. Her contribution centred on the question of how the psychoanalytic institutions impinge on the development of the ego ideal of the psychoanalyst. She stated that it is inevitable that narcissistic wounds are inflicted on the psychoanalyst in the psychoanalytic situation and that the psychoanalytic institution does not ease the pain of these wounds but helps to diminish the ideology that is made of the ego ideal, it helps to humanize it. The institution can act as a superego that creates a protective paternal image which can help us to give up our infantile illusions of grandiosity that are inherent in the ego ideal. The institution in its role as a protective superego can also help us to deal with another difficulty in our analytical practice: the erotization of that practice. The pleasure of functioning as an analyst is great and necessary. But it can become so large as to lead to an actual erotization. By this Kestemberg meant a defensive erotization that prevents the development of the analytic process. The institution also serves us as a measure of how far we all and each one of us are from being the ideal analyst. But it serves us at the same time to maintain our self-esteem. The institution also serves as a place where we can project everything that we cannot express in our daily work. If we were more aware of the fact that the institution serves this purpose, we would become more able to tolerate the attacks on our narcissism by the projections that we, all of us, are the object of. We could acquire the possibility of tempering our ego ideal.
Homer Curtis felt that we have much trouble with our own striv