You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Dear Sir:
As Dr Robert Wallerstein reported in his paper, 'Psychoanalysis: the common ground' (International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, Volume 71, Part 1, 1990), our study clearly indicated that there are significant differences at least among four major theoretical groups in psychoanalysis in the areas of the interpretation of transference, of defense and resistance, of aggression, of primitive impulses, in the sensitivity to the patient's vulnerability, and the use of characteristic language.
We concluded our paper with the question: 'What difference do these differences make?' We answered it by stating that this was a problem for future researchers to resolve, using systematic, scientific methodology. We do not believe that definitive conclusions can be drawn from anecdotal clinical material, authoritative opinions, or armchair theorizing.
In the last analysis, the effect of theoretical orientation on clinical practice and therapeutic outcome must be based on sound research findings, not on the powers of persuasive oratory.
Respectfully submitted,