You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
We have come a long way from viewing the psychoanalytic process as a special brand of archeology, bent on uncovering ever-deeper layers of the patient's mind. It is now possible to believe that what is uncovered during a session is not necessarily a privileged account of before, a fragment of what really happened, but something quite different from the original. Indeed, Lamm tells us that ‘there may well be no robust relationship’ between what happens in the session and what happened in the past (p. 267). Moving to a more abstract level of argument, Lamm suggests that ‘there may well be a disjunction (within psychoanalytic discourse) between the theory of development and the theory of change’ (p. 267) and it would follow that treating a patient may have little in common with raising a child, despite the many current efforts to make this metaphor come true.
Rather than treat psychoanalysis as an excavation of memory which may lead us to the psychic bedrock of the analysand, Lamm wants us to learn how to create an empathic narrative which is ‘the verbal or linguistic medium through which the past is mastered and assimilated, if not exactly abolished and eliminated’ (p. 266). Narrative intervention, he reminds us, is a particular variety of discursive thinking which has close ties to the primary process and, as such, functions as a carrier for our experience and its residue of affective meanings (secondary process accounts tend to strip away the affect and emphasise the underlying logic). As retellings of the past begin to approach the patient's original experience, its various aspects (goes the theory) are worked through and laid to rest. The process of cure is thus directly linked to our skill in creating this empathic narrative which is clearly something more than reminding the patient of known facts about the past.
It can be seen that what might be called the analyst's theory of the past has a lot to do with how he constructs this linking narrative. Lamm makes a dist